Independent Power Projects
The greater Sunshine Coast region is the focal point of a large number of Independent Power Projects (IPPs); over 180 have been proposed or approved. We believe these projects are being undertaken in an environmentally reckless manner.
We are concerned about independent power projects in general and specifically the Stlixwim project for the following reasons:
is no strategic higher level land use plan for the greater Sunshine
Coast region. Consequently there is no process for assessing the land
base needs of the various economic sectors or public and private
stakeholders. This level of planning should take place before IPPs are
- Regional government is specifically denied
any statutory role in the IPP approval process. This is the level of
government that most closely understands the environmental, social and
economic needs of the community and the region.
needs of species-at-risk have not been accounted for in the SC Forest
District. For example; the Province has so far refused to accept the
recommendations of the federal Marbled Murrelet Recovery Team. Also,
the Province has left Mountain Goat winter ranges undesignated in the
SC Forest District for over 10 years. There are potential impacts to
these and many other species-at-risk.
- IPP proponents
are not obligated to respect Landscape Unit Plans, Old Growth
Management Areas, Wildlife Habitat Areas, or other environmental
- The IPP approval process does not consider or
limit the cumulative impact of numerous proposed or existing IPPs,
neither does it consider the cumulative impacts of other resource uses
(such as forestry) on the potentially affected watersheds.
Stlixwim project is large enough to qualify for a provincial
environmental assessment. However, this process is scientifically
superficial. For example; the proposed time frame for the assessment is
eight months; not enough time to even establish or verify flow regimes
for the 19 tributaries that will be diverted.
publics most significant environmental asset in the Tzoonie watershed
is the large (and potentially much larger) fish population. An 8-month
impact assessment time frame is entirely insufficient to determine long
term impacts to the fish populations. For example; how will all these
dams, diversions, spoilage areas and transmission corridors affect
water temperatures and nutrient cycles with in the Tzoonies ecosystems?
principle, the SCCA is not opposed to small, potentially green
hydroelectric projects. However, in the absence of comprehensive land
use planning, effective environmental impact assessment and effective
regulatory enforcement, approval of independent power projects must be
viewed as alarming and reckless.
For more information see our Position Paper on IPPs.
Also see Recommendations for Responsible Clean Electricity Development in British Columbia," authored by the David Suzuki Foundation, the Pembina Institute, Watershed Watch Salmon Society and West Coast Environmental Law, and endorsed by 25 environmental organizations across BC.
More information and updates on IPPs can be found at Citizens for Public Power, Save Our Rivers, and Friends of Bute Inlet.
Last Updated on Tuesday, 22 March 2011 20:05